Details
-
Type:
extRequest
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Done
-
Component/s: CreatiFI
-
Labels:None
Description
Dear user,
thank you for your interest in the Security Monitoring GE. We would like to warn you that this GE is now deprecated and has been replaced by the CyberSecurity GE. You can download a Reference Implementation of it called CyberCAPTOR here:
https://github.com/fiware-cybercaptor
This has not been published yet on FIWARE catalog, but it will be done very soon.
Concerning your question, in the old Security Monitoring version, the output is downloadable from a link that you should receive after having send your input. In the new CyberCAPTOR version, the whole process has been revised and is more user-friendly.
Best regards,
The Security Monitoring team
************************************
Dear FIWARE coach,
we forward you a support request received from a CreatiFI applicant we are
not able to solve.
Please let us know if you need direct contact with the submitter.
Thanks.
************************************
Hi,
we are trying to use this instance of mulval attack:
http://secmonitoring.testbed.fi-ware.org/AttackGraphEngine/attackgraph.jsp
unfortunately with different input it seems that we always get the same
output (found in the Annex)
are we doing something wrong?
************************************
_______________________________________________
Fiware-creatifi-coaching mailing list
Fiware-creatifi-coaching@lists.fi-ware.org
https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-creatifi-coaching
[Created via e-mail received from: Andrea Maestrini <amaestrini@create-net.org>]
Issue Links
- relates to
-
HELP-4504
FIWARE.Request.Tech.Security.CyberSecurity.security monitoring instance Trento node
-
- Closed
-
Activity
| Transition | Time In Source Status | Execution Times | Last Executer | Last Execution Date | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
38d 7h 12m | 1 | Bettan Olivier | 20/Aug/15 3:47 PM | |||||
|
6s | 1 | Bettan Olivier | 20/Aug/15 3:47 PM | |||||
|
41d 28m | 1 | Silvio Cretti | 30/Sep/15 4:16 PM |
| Summary | [Fiware-creatifi-coaching] [CreatiFI Italy Hub] security monitoring instance Trento node | FIWARE.Request.Coach.CreatiFI.Security monitoring instance Trento node |
| Resolution | Done [ 10000 ] | |
| Status | Answered [ 10104 ] | Closed [ 6 ] |
| Component/s | _TECH_ [ 11400 ] |
| Component/s | _TECH_ [ 11400 ] |
| Assignee | Bettan Olivier [ olivier.bettan ] | Silvio Cretti [ silvio.cretti ] |
| Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | Answered [ 10104 ] |
| Status | Open [ 1 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
| Description |
Dear FIWARE coach, we forward you a support request received from a CreatiFI applicant we are not able to solve. Please let us know if you need direct contact with the submitter. Thanks. ************************************ Hi, we are trying to use this instance of mulval attack: http://secmonitoring.testbed.fi-ware.org/AttackGraphEngine/attackgraph.jsp unfortunately with different input it seems that we always get the same output (found in the Annex) are we doing something wrong? ************************************ _______________________________________________ Fiware-creatifi-coaching mailing list Fiware-creatifi-coaching@lists.fi-ware.org https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-creatifi-coaching [Created via e-mail received from: Andrea Maestrini <amaestrini@create-net.org>] |
Dear user, thank you for your interest in the Security Monitoring GE. We would like to warn you that this GE is now deprecated and has been replaced by the CyberSecurity GE. You can download a Reference Implementation of it called CyberCAPTOR here: https://github.com/fiware-cybercaptor This has not been published yet on FIWARE catalog, but it will be done very soon. Concerning your question, in the old Security Monitoring version, the output is downloadable from a link that you should receive after having send your input. In the new CyberCAPTOR version, the whole process has been revised and is more user-friendly. Best regards, The Security Monitoring team ************************************ Dear FIWARE coach, we forward you a support request received from a CreatiFI applicant we are not able to solve. Please let us know if you need direct contact with the submitter. Thanks. ************************************ Hi, we are trying to use this instance of mulval attack: http://secmonitoring.testbed.fi-ware.org/AttackGraphEngine/attackgraph.jsp unfortunately with different input it seems that we always get the same output (found in the Annex) are we doing something wrong? ************************************ _______________________________________________ Fiware-creatifi-coaching mailing list Fiware-creatifi-coaching@lists.fi-ware.org https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-creatifi-coaching [Created via e-mail received from: Andrea Maestrini <amaestrini@create-net.org>] |
Dear,
sorry, but we opened the ticket 15 days ago, but up to now no feedback.
The CreatiFI applicants need ASAP some feedback in order to fix him issues.
Can you reply to us something asap, please?
BR
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Andrea Maestrini <amaestrini@create-net.org
> wrote:
> Dear FIWARE coach,
> we received an updated from a CreatiFI applicants who is asking for news
> about his issue.
> The developer needs an answer asap.
> Could you provide some hints?
> Thanks in advance.
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Andrea Maestrini <
> amaestrini@create-net.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear FIWARE coach,
>> we received an updated from a CreatiFI applicants who is asking for news
>> about his issue.
>> CreatiFI phase 1 finishes on 15th of July.
>> The developer needs an answer asap.
>> Could you provide some hints?
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Andrea Maestrini <
>> amaestrini@create-net.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear FIWARE coach,
>>> we forward you a support request received from a CreatiFI applicant we
>>> are not able to solve.
>>> Please let us know if you need direct contact with the submitter.
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> ************************************
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> we are trying to use this instance of mulval attack:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://secmonitoring.testbed.fi-ware.org/AttackGraphEngine/attackgraph.jsp
>>>
>>> unfortunately with different input it seems that we always get the same
>>> output (found in the Annex)
>>>
>>> are we doing something wrong?
>>>
>>> ************************************
>>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Fiware-creatifi-coaching mailing list
Fiware-creatifi-coaching@lists.fi-ware.org
https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-creatifi-coaching
Dear FIWARE coach,
we received an updated from a CreatiFI applicants who is asking for news
about his issue.
The developer needs an answer asap.
Could you provide some hints?
Thanks in advance.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Andrea Maestrini <amaestrini@create-net.org
> wrote:
> Dear FIWARE coach,
> we received an updated from a CreatiFI applicants who is asking for news
> about his issue.
> CreatiFI phase 1 finishes on 15th of July.
> The developer needs an answer asap.
> Could you provide some hints?
> Thanks in advance.
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Andrea Maestrini <
> amaestrini@create-net.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear FIWARE coach,
>> we forward you a support request received from a CreatiFI applicant we
>> are not able to solve.
>> Please let us know if you need direct contact with the submitter.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> ************************************
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we are trying to use this instance of mulval attack:
>>
>> http://secmonitoring.testbed.fi-ware.org/AttackGraphEngine/attackgraph.jsp
>>
>> unfortunately with different input it seems that we always get the same
>> output (found in the Annex)
>>
>> are we doing something wrong?
>>
>> ************************************
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Fiware-creatifi-coaching mailing list
Fiware-creatifi-coaching@lists.fi-ware.org
https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-creatifi-coaching
Dear FIWARE coach,
we received an updated from a CreatiFI applicants who is asking for news
about his issue.
CreatiFI phase 1 finishes on 15th of July.
The developer needs an answer asap.
Could you provide some hints?
Thanks in advance.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Andrea Maestrini <amaestrini@create-net.org
> wrote:
> Dear FIWARE coach,
> we forward you a support request received from a CreatiFI applicant we are
> not able to solve.
> Please let us know if you need direct contact with the submitter.
> Thanks.
>
> ************************************
>
> Hi,
>
> we are trying to use this instance of mulval attack:
>
> http://secmonitoring.testbed.fi-ware.org/AttackGraphEngine/attackgraph.jsp
>
> unfortunately with different input it seems that we always get the same
> output (found in the Annex)
>
> are we doing something wrong?
>
> ************************************
>
_______________________________________________
Fiware-creatifi-coaching mailing list
Fiware-creatifi-coaching@lists.fi-ware.org
https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-creatifi-coaching
| Assignee | Silvio Cretti [ silvio.cretti ] | Bettan Olivier [ olivier.bettan ] |
| Assignee | Silvio Cretti [ silvio.cretti ] |
| Field | Original Value | New Value |
|---|---|---|
| Component/s | CreatiFI [ 10357 ] |
Dear user,
thank you for your interest in the Security Monitoring GE. We would like to warn you that this GE is now deprecated and has been replaced by the CyberSecurity GE. You can download a Reference Implementation of it called CyberCAPTOR here:
https://github.com/fiware-cybercaptor
This has not been published yet on FIWARE catalog, but it will be done very soon.
Concerning your question, in the old Security Monitoring version, the output is downloadable from a link that you should receive after having send your input. In the new CyberCAPTOR version, the whole process has been revised and is more user-friendly.
Best regards,
The Security Monitoring team