Uploaded image for project: 'Help-Desk'
  1. Help-Desk
  2. HELP-4766

FIWARE.Question.Tech.Apps.ApplicationMashup.TestbedCompability

    Details

      Description

      Created question in FIWARE Q/A platform on 04-07-2014 at 15:07
      Please, ANSWER this question AT http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24575109/wirecloud-fi-ware-testbed-compatibility

      Question:
      Wirecloud FI-Ware Testbed compatibility

      Description:
      I was wondering if Wirecloud offers complete support for object storage with FI-WARE Testbed instead of Fi-lab. I have successfully integrated Wirecloud with Testbed and have developed a set of widgets that are able to upload/download files to specific containers in Fi-lab with success. However, the same widgets do not seem to work in Fi-lab, as i get an error 500 when trying to retrieve the auth tokens (also with the well known object-storage-test widget) containing the following response:

      SyntaxError: Unexpected token
      at Object.parse (native)
      at create (/home/fiware/fi-ware-keystone-proxy/controllers/Token.js:343:25)
      at callbacks (/home/fiware/fi-ware-keystone-proxy/node_modules/express/lib/router/index.js:164:37)
      at param (/home/fiware/fi-ware-keystone-proxy/node_modules/express/lib/router/index.js:138:11)
      at pass (/home/fiware/fi-ware-keystone-proxy/node_modules/express/lib/router/index.js:145:5)
      at Router._dispatch (/home/fiware/fi-ware-keystone-proxy/node_modules/express/lib/router/index.js:173:5)
      at Object.router (/home/fiware/fi-ware-keystone-proxy/node_modules/express/lib/router/index.js:33:10)
      at next (/home/fiware/fi-ware-keystone-proxy/node_modules/express/node_modules/connect/lib/proto.js:195:15)
      at Object.handle (/home/fiware/fi-ware-keystone-proxy/server.js:31:5)
      at next (/home/fiware/fi-ware-keystone-proxy/node_modules/express/node_modules/connect/lib/proto.js:195:15)

      I noticed that the token provided in the beggining (to start the transaction) is

      token: Object
      id: "%fiware_token%"

      Any idea regarding what might have gone wrong?

        Activity

        Hide
        mev Manuel Escriche added a comment -

        2015-10-13 12:00|CREATED monitor | # answers= 1, accepted answer= True

        Show
        mev Manuel Escriche added a comment - 2015-10-13 12:00|CREATED monitor | # answers= 1, accepted answer= True
        Hide
        mev Manuel Escriche added a comment -

        2015-10-13 15:05|UPDATED status: transition Answer| # answers= 1, accepted answer= True

        Show
        mev Manuel Escriche added a comment - 2015-10-13 15:05|UPDATED status: transition Answer| # answers= 1, accepted answer= True
        Hide
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager added a comment -

        2015-10-13 16:24|UPDATED status: transition Answered| # answers= 1, accepted answer= True

        Show
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager added a comment - 2015-10-13 16:24|UPDATED status: transition Answered| # answers= 1, accepted answer= True
        Hide
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager added a comment -

        2015-10-18 09:05|UPDATED status: transition Finish| # answers= 1, accepted answer= True

        Show
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager added a comment - 2015-10-18 09:05|UPDATED status: transition Finish| # answers= 1, accepted answer= True

          People

          • Assignee:
            aarranz Álvaro Arranz
            Reporter:
            mev Manuel Escriche
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: