Details
-
Type:
extRequest
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Done
-
Fix Version/s: 2021
-
Component/s: FIWARE-LAB-HELP
-
Labels:None
-
HD-Node:Zurich
Description
Dear FIWARE support team,
in terms of FIC2Lab project we have set up a big machine which autonomously performs integration and functional testing using a container-based unit test runner (one unit test per SE or GE is one Jenkins job creating, testing and destroying a Docker container).
This machine is currently hosted by Lannion2.
As the number of software components we support this way in terms of sustainability grows, and we expect e.g. more GEs to come, I think it makes sense to request additional capacity from another node located somewhere else aside from Lannion to reduce risks of service outage.
Beyond the project scope we plan also to scale up the complexity of testing e.g. add load testing or other.
How do you think what is the best way to pick a node who would agree to provide a somewhat bigger flavour as we use it at Lannion?
- 4-6 CPUs
- 16 or better 24 GB RAM because of required environment simulation of more complex components. We have got one which alone requires at least 16GB and this in my opinion might cause heavy disk swapping and overall system performance decrease.
- 80 GB disk size
- 500 GB additional volume as Docker images cache
Attached: current Jenkins status dashboard.
Activity
Apologies for the delay on this - this one slipped between the cracks, unfortunately.
We have made the allocation as advised above.
root@node-1:~/maintenance_scripts# cinder quota-show [REDACTED]
----------------+
| Property | Value |
----------------+
| gigabytes | 100 |
| snapshots | 2 |
| volumes | 2 |
----------------+
root@node-1:~/maintenance_scripts# nova quota-show --tenant [REDACTED]
----------------------------------+
| Quota | Limit |
----------------------------------+
| instances | 5 |
| cores | 10 |
| ram | 10240 |
| floating_ips | 1 |
| fixed_ips | 5 |
| metadata_items | 128 |
| injected_files | 5 |
| injected_file_content_bytes | 10240 |
| injected_file_path_bytes | 255 |
| key_pairs | 10 |
| security_groups | 10 |
| security_group_rules | 10 |
----------------------------------+
root@node-1:~/maintenance_scripts# neutron quota-show --tenant-id [REDACTED]
--------------------------+
| Field | Value |
--------------------------+
| floatingip | 1 |
| network | 10 |
| port | 50 |
| router | 10 |
| security_group | 10 |
| security_group_rule | 100 |
| subnet | 10 |
--------------------------+
root@node-1:~/maintenance_scripts#
Closing, thx.
Clarification: do I have to migrate this instance to Zurich2? (in this case please enable quota for Zurich2, it is not available)
Hi Peter,
Not yet, we are currently testing Zurich2 region in a daily basis before migrating users from Zurich region to Zurich2.
As soon as we finish testing this region and start the migration process you will be notified and the new region will be enabled for your user.
Best regards,
Bruno
Peter, wouldn't it be better to create a new request next time?
Or was the issue badly fixed, and now it appeared again?
Thanks.
Dear user,
since Lannion node appers to have enough resources we are going to assign them your request.
Kind regards