Uploaded image for project: 'Help-Desk'
  1. Help-Desk
  2. HELP-1916

FIWARE.Request.Lab.FI-Lab Assistance.

    Details

    • Type: extRequest
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Done
    • Fix Version/s: 2021
    • Component/s: FIWARE-LAB-HELP
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Hello,
      I'm a member of a small team of developers interested in using your APIs.
      1) I'm currently trying to set up an instance of a VM in Fiware Lab, for
      testing purposes, and every time I try to create an instance of a blueprint
      I "get" a instance with the status set to error. I keep getting this error
      for both types of templates, new templates and templates cloned from the
      Catalog. The error i keep getting is:
      Status: ERROR
      Error: Infrastructure error Error in parse response after deploy the
      VM***************

      2)I've managed to create a "working instace of a ubuntu server 12.04. When
      i try to attach a new floating point Ip i can only create an
      "FederationNode-ExternalNetwork" one, and i can not create a "ext-net
      adress". The FederationNode-ExternalNetwork adress can not be associated
      with the working Vm ( result when I try to associate it: {"badRequest":
      {"message": "Error. Unable to associate floating ip", "code": 400}} )

      3)I can connect to my server from the Connection -> View Display option, i
      get to the login screen of the server instance, but i can't find the
      username and password for the instance. Is there a default one, or can i
      set it somewhere?

      I've tried this on a couple of Regions, and the Lannion region is the only
      one where i was able to create an instance that says the image is running.

      Srdačan pozdrav / Best regards,
      Vuk Banjanin
      codecentric d.o.o.
      Bulevar oslobodjenja 127/XIII, 21000 Novi Sad,Srbija
      Tel: + 381 (64) 2617764 <%2B%20381%2021%20539786>
      Mob: + 381 (64) 2617764 <%2B%20381%20%2863%29%208445468>
      www.codecentric.rs
      www.codecentric.de
      codecentric AG | Merscheider Straße 1 | 42699 Solingen | Deutschland
      www.codecentric.de | blog.codecentric.de | www.meettheexperts.de |
      www.more4fi.de

      Sitz der Gesellschaft: Düsseldorf | HRB 63043 | Amtsgericht Düsseldorf
      Vorstand: Michael Hochgürtel . Mirko Novakovic . Rainer Vehns
      Aufsichtsrat: Patric Fedlmeier (Vorsitzender) . Klaus Jäger . Jürgen Schütz

      Diese E-Mail einschließlich evtl. beigefügter Dateien enthält vertrauliche
      und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige
      Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie
      bitte sofort den Absender und löschen Sie diese E-Mail und evtl.
      beigefügter Dateien umgehend. Das unerlaubte Kopieren, Nutzen oder Öffnen
      evtl. beigefügter Dateien sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser E-Mail ist
      nicht gestattet.

      _______________________________________________
      Fiware-lab-help mailing list
      Fiware-lab-help@lists.fi-ware.org
      https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-lab-help

      [Created via e-mail received from: Vuk Banjanin <vuk.banjanin@codecentric.de>]

        Activity

        Hide
        fw.ext.user FW External User added a comment - - edited

        Hi Uwe,

        If I understand it right, everything worked on Lannion region, so no action from our side. Am I right or I’ve misunderstood the comment?

        Best regards

        Sergio

        Show
        fw.ext.user FW External User added a comment - - edited Hi Uwe, If I understand it right, everything worked on Lannion region, so no action from our side. Am I right or I’ve misunderstood the comment? Best regards Sergio
        Hide
        uwe Uwe Herzog (Inactive) added a comment -

        Hi Sergio,

        for Lannion it worked partly:
        "i was able to create in image instance on Lannion" (so this worked fine)
        and here comes what did not work:
        "but i wasn't able to connect it to a floating Ip, i could only connect to it via the "view display" function in the browser"

        Is that the thing that users need to contact you to get a public IP address?

        Best regards,
        Uwe

        Show
        uwe Uwe Herzog (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Sergio, for Lannion it worked partly: "i was able to create in image instance on Lannion" (so this worked fine) and here comes what did not work: "but i wasn't able to connect it to a floating Ip, i could only connect to it via the "view display" function in the browser" Is that the thing that users need to contact you to get a public IP address? Best regards, Uwe
        Hide
        uwe Uwe Herzog (Inactive) added a comment -

        Hi Vuk,

        please find below the responses from two of the nodes. I saw that Lannion node already contacted you directly. I hope that these answers will help you. If the other nodes will still reply I’ll forward the answers to you.

        I’ll close this ticket now. If you need further help don’t hesitate to send an email to helpdesk again.

        Best regards,
        Uwe

        --------------------------------
        Info from Prague node:

        creating VMs in Prague works fine according to our tests. There is the long-standing inability to allocate public IPv4 address, but that's expected because they are all allocated to tenants or VMs most of the time. It's unfortunate, but it's a direct result of a policy decision which was to allow tenants to allocate up to one IPv4 address on a self-service basis, with no prior justification.

        The user appears to have troubles deploying blueprints form the Cloud Portal. We do not have access to error logs from the Cloud Portal, and as such we cannot really help troubleshoot problems that users might have with it. To the best of our knowledge, API calls to our OpenStack controller result in VMs being created and deployed, so the problem is apparently elsewhere. I'd also like to point out that I filed a ticket [1] about the central Keystone being unreachable earlier today; that might be related to the issue at hand.
        ------------------------------
        Info from Budapest node:
        In the Budapest node there were some issues with nfs on Monday (as reported to the help desk), and we also noticed that there were no free IPs in the shared network, resulting in error during the instance creation. Both issues have been solved by now. So, Budapest node is back again.
        ------------------------------

        Show
        uwe Uwe Herzog (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Vuk, please find below the responses from two of the nodes. I saw that Lannion node already contacted you directly. I hope that these answers will help you. If the other nodes will still reply I’ll forward the answers to you. I’ll close this ticket now. If you need further help don’t hesitate to send an email to helpdesk again. Best regards, Uwe -------------------------------- Info from Prague node: creating VMs in Prague works fine according to our tests. There is the long-standing inability to allocate public IPv4 address, but that's expected because they are all allocated to tenants or VMs most of the time. It's unfortunate, but it's a direct result of a policy decision which was to allow tenants to allocate up to one IPv4 address on a self-service basis, with no prior justification. The user appears to have troubles deploying blueprints form the Cloud Portal. We do not have access to error logs from the Cloud Portal, and as such we cannot really help troubleshoot problems that users might have with it. To the best of our knowledge, API calls to our OpenStack controller result in VMs being created and deployed, so the problem is apparently elsewhere. I'd also like to point out that I filed a ticket [1] about the central Keystone being unreachable earlier today; that might be related to the issue at hand. ------------------------------ Info from Budapest node: In the Budapest node there were some issues with nfs on Monday (as reported to the help desk), and we also noticed that there were no free IPs in the shared network, resulting in error during the instance creation. Both issues have been solved by now. So, Budapest node is back again. ------------------------------
        Hide
        fw.ext.user FW External User added a comment - - edited

        Dear Uwe,

        Concerning the node of Crete, I don't see any problem in creating an
        instance from an image.
        If there is an error, it is usually a problem of exceeding quotas
        (number of VCPUs, instances, etc).
        On the other hand, creating an instance from a Blueprint becomes to an
        an ERROR which does not become from the environment of Crete (at least I
        don't see anything in our logs) and every time it is something different.
        For example, the last time I tried to create an instance, I got the
        following ERROR message:
        "Error: Error installing a product.
        Description:com.telefonica.euro_iaas.paasmanager.exception.ProductInstallatorException:
        Error installing product apache2-4.0 Error invokg SDC to Install
        Productapache2-4.0 4.0 HTTP 500 Internal Server Error"

        Best Regards,

        Spyros.

        _______________________________________________
        Fiware-lab-help mailing list
        Fiware-lab-help@lists.fi-ware.org
        https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-lab-help

        Show
        fw.ext.user FW External User added a comment - - edited Dear Uwe, Concerning the node of Crete, I don't see any problem in creating an instance from an image. If there is an error, it is usually a problem of exceeding quotas (number of VCPUs, instances, etc). On the other hand, creating an instance from a Blueprint becomes to an an ERROR which does not become from the environment of Crete (at least I don't see anything in our logs) and every time it is something different. For example, the last time I tried to create an instance, I got the following ERROR message: "Error: Error installing a product. Description:com.telefonica.euro_iaas.paasmanager.exception.ProductInstallatorException: Error installing product apache2-4.0 Error invokg SDC to Install Productapache2-4.0 4.0 HTTP 500 Internal Server Error" Best Regards, Spyros. _______________________________________________ Fiware-lab-help mailing list Fiware-lab-help@lists.fi-ware.org https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-lab-help
        Hide
        fw.ext.user FW External User added a comment -

        Hi Uwe,

        From the ZH side, the problem is with the metadata service - we have been
        looking into how
        to fix it, but we concluded that the best approach is to move to icehouse
        asap and we plan on
        doing this next week.

        BR,
        Seán.

        _______________________________________________
        Fiware-lab-help mailing list
        Fiware-lab-help@lists.fi-ware.org
        https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-lab-help

        Show
        fw.ext.user FW External User added a comment - Hi Uwe, From the ZH side, the problem is with the metadata service - we have been looking into how to fix it, but we concluded that the best approach is to move to icehouse asap and we plan on doing this next week. BR, Seán. _______________________________________________ Fiware-lab-help mailing list Fiware-lab-help@lists.fi-ware.org https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-lab-help

          People

          • Assignee:
            uwe Uwe Herzog (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            fw.ext.user FW External User
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: