Details
-
Type: extRequest
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority: Major
-
Resolution: Done
-
Fix Version/s: 2021
-
Component/s: FIWARE-TECH-HELP
-
Labels:None
-
HD-Chapter:Data
-
HD-Enabler:Orion
Description
Hello,
My name is Divi and I work for a software development company called
intraHouse.
We’re participating in the FIMAC Project (http://www.fiwaremac.org/en/).
FIMAC advises and trains 16 Mararonesian entrepreneurs to develop their
business with the Internet of the Future, greatly improving the
competitiveness of your business. So, we're one of these companies and we
have some questions/doubst we have about the fiware technology.
We’re participating in this program with a platform we’ve been developing
for one year called city.live.
city.live is our innovative geolocation service that brings cities to life,
giving the user everything they need to interact with a city, easily and
quickly. city.live is a free service that allows you to find any place or
activity in the world, and it even gives you the chance of creating your
Point of Interests and Collections (travel guides) to use privately or to
share them with the rest of the city.live community.
The platform is available both for desktop and mobile (iOS
<https://itunes.apple.com/es/app/city.live/id1176961723?mt=8> and Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.intrahouse.citylive>), and
it currently has more than 1.000 downloads in the app stores. city.live
feeds on open data sources such as social media, Google Places and
Allevents amongst others.
So, our initial idea was to use fiware open data sources and integrate them
into our platform, but we’ve been looking into the fiware data and as far
as we’ve seen they’re obsolete or not updated. Other problem we see is that
each data source has its own structure, for example, the structure of the
data source from the Town Hall of Santa Cruz de Tenerife is completely
different from the structure of other Town Hall. That means that we would
have to create a source reader for each town hall. Maybe we’re not looking
the right open data or there’s something else we can integrate; can you
give us some feedback about it?
For participate on this program, it’s assumed that we have to be compatible
with fiware, and as we know, this would be possible by being: “powered by
fiware” or “fiware ready”. Could you please explain us what this involve
exactly? or in other words, what do we have to implement in our platform to
comply with any of these 2 standards?
Thank you,
–
*Divya-Ram *
Business Manager
IntraHouse
(Spain): + 34 653 919 871
www.intrahouse.com
divya@intrahouse.com
__________________________________________________________________________________________
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies on the following links:
- http://forge.fiware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE_Privacy_Policy
- http://forge.fiware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Cookies_Policy_FIWARE
Fiware-lab-help mailing list
Fiware-lab-help@lists.fiware.org
https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-lab-help
[Created via e-mail received from: Divya-Ram Kishinchand Daswani <divya@intrahouse.com>]
Activity
- All
- Comments
- History
- Activity
- Transitions
The FIWARE Data Models that you can be compliant with are those specified at https://schema.fiware.org
The compliance with Data Models is something which is not mandatory for being considered Powered by FIWARE. You can see the definitions of the different flavours of Powered by FIWARE at
http://marketplace.fiware.org/
Of course it is always good to be compliant with the Data Models.
Wrt Santa Cruz de Tenerife data, etc. I guess you are talking about data at data.lab.fiware.org, and yes there could be many data that could be obsolete or not compliant with any FIWARE Data Model. So I would not worry about it. It is old.