Uploaded image for project: 'Help-Coaches-Desk'
  1. Help-Coaches-Desk
  2. HELC-764

FIWARE.Request.Coach.FICHe.Several questions regarding FIWARE

    Details

    • Type: extRequest
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Done
    • Component/s: FICHe
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Responses are in-line
      -----------
      Dear Franck,

      I have several questions about FIWARE and its platform. I hope you can help me to answer these questions.

      • Are there any opportunities for us to help on the development of enablers?
      • Please explain how this can be achieved and if there is any form of compensation.
        -> Such processes are not defined today, despite they are under discussion, starting with the possible integration of enablers from phase 2 projects. However, you are still free to contact enablers development teams directly and propose your contribution.
      • Can anyone use FIWARE and FI-STAR?
      • Can we start our own FIWARE project without the use of a acceleration program?
        -> FIWARE is open to everybody so any use, outside of the acceleration program is much welcome.
      • FI-LAB: How long do we have access to our node/instance?
      • Do we have to pay after the FICHe program is over?
        -> FIWARE overall intends to be sustainable. FIWARE lab will at least remains accessible in the current conditions until the end of the on-going-projects (~end 2016). Conditions for follow-up are under discussion.
      • Do we need to use the FI-LAB during the PoC phase?
        -> It is intended to accelerate your development but there are no obligations.
      • It seems that some enablers have been removed from the catalogue. Why did this happen and will they return?
        -> Some enablers were removed at the end of last year when the release of at least one implementation as open-source as be put as mandatory. Some enablers contributors stepped back at that time.
      • What are the risks when a enabler receives an update? Could it be possible that our implementation needs an update as well?
        -> Yes, this is a high risk. I have not seen yet systematic non-regression testing on enablers.

      _______________________________________________
      Fiware-fiche-coaching mailing list
      Fiware-fiche-coaching@lists.fi-ware.org
      https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-fiche-coaching

        Activity

        Hide
        Stefano Stefano De Panfilis added a comment -

        dear franck,

        thank you very much for providing so detailed answers.

        i'd like to add a small detail here. if a user is really highly interested
        on a specific generic enabler that for some reasons is not any longer in
        the catalogue, we can make him/her directly in contact with the generic
        enabler owner to understand if there are possible solutions.

        this will be a bi-lateral talk which may or may not involve fiware at pure
        discretion of the parties (user ge owner).
        of course if it happens that a removed ge becomes so relevant it migth be
        reintroduced in the catalogue if there are candidates (the former ge owner
        or others) for maintaining and evolving it according to fiware standards.

        ciao,
        stefano

        2015-05-20 14:59 GMT+02:00 Franck Le Gall <franck.le-gall@eglobalmark.com>:

        > Responses are in-line
        >
        > -----------
        >
        > Dear Franck,
        >
        > I have several questions about FIWARE and its platform. I hope you can
        > help me to answer these questions.
        >
        > - Are there any opportunities for us to help on the development of
        > enablers?
        > - Please explain how this can be achieved and if there is any form
        > of compensation.
        >
        > -> Such processes are not defined today, despite they are under
        > discussion, starting with the possible integration of enablers from phase 2
        > projects. However, you are still free to contact enablers development teams
        > directly and propose your contribution.
        >
        > - Can anyone use FIWARE and FI-STAR?
        > - Can we start our own FIWARE project without the use of a
        > acceleration program?
        >
        > -> FIWARE is open to everybody so any use, outside of the acceleration
        > program is much welcome.
        >
        > - Can we start a traineeship around FIWARE?
        >
        > -> http://edu.fiware.org aims at providing a starting point. To go
        > further, developers weeks are organized regularly. Next one will be in
        > Vienna on May 26-28:
        > http://www.fiware.org/event/fiware-developers-week-vienna/
        >
        > - FI-LAB: How long do we have access to our node/instance?
        > - Do we have to pay after the FICHe program is over?
        >
        > -> FIWARE overall intends to be sustainable. FIWARE lab will at least
        > remains accessible in the current conditions until the end of the
        > on-going-projects (~end 2016). Conditions for follow-up are under
        > discussion.
        >
        > - Do we need to use the FI-LAB during the PoC phase?
        >
        > -> It is intended to accelerate your development but there are no
        > obligations.
        >
        > - Questions regarding enablers
        > - A lot of enablers are still in alpha/beta phases. What is the
        > roadmap for these enablers? When do you expect to have a stable release for
        > these enablers?
        >
        > -> Enablers roadmap is available here :
        > http://forge.fiware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Technical_Roadmap
        >
        > - It seems that some enablers have been removed from the catalogue. Why
        > did this happen and will they return?
        >
        > -> Some enablers were removed at the end of last year when the release of
        > at least one implementation as open-source as be put as mandatory. Some
        > enablers contributors stepped back at that time.
        >
        > - What are the risks when a enabler receives an update? Could it be
        > possible that our implementation needs an update as well?
        >
        > -> Yes, this is a high risk. I have not seen yet systematic non-regression
        > testing on enablers.
        >
        >
        >
        > _______________________________________________
        > Fiware-fiche-coaching mailing list
        > Fiware-fiche-coaching@lists.fi-ware.org
        > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-fiche-coaching
        >
        >


        Stefano De Panfilis
        Chief Innovation Officer
        Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
        via Riccardo Morandi 32
        00148 Roma
        Italy

        tel (direct): +39-06-8759-4253
        tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
        fax: +39-068307-4200
        cell: +39-335-7542-567
        skype: depa01
        twitter: @depa01

        _______________________________________________
        Fiware-fiche-coaching mailing list
        Fiware-fiche-coaching@lists.fi-ware.org
        https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-fiche-coaching

        Show
        Stefano Stefano De Panfilis added a comment - dear franck, thank you very much for providing so detailed answers. i'd like to add a small detail here. if a user is really highly interested on a specific generic enabler that for some reasons is not any longer in the catalogue, we can make him/her directly in contact with the generic enabler owner to understand if there are possible solutions. this will be a bi-lateral talk which may or may not involve fiware at pure discretion of the parties (user ge owner). of course if it happens that a removed ge becomes so relevant it migth be reintroduced in the catalogue if there are candidates (the former ge owner or others) for maintaining and evolving it according to fiware standards. ciao, stefano 2015-05-20 14:59 GMT+02:00 Franck Le Gall <franck.le-gall@eglobalmark.com>: > Responses are in-line > > ----------- > > Dear Franck, > > I have several questions about FIWARE and its platform. I hope you can > help me to answer these questions. > > - Are there any opportunities for us to help on the development of > enablers? > - Please explain how this can be achieved and if there is any form > of compensation. > > -> Such processes are not defined today, despite they are under > discussion, starting with the possible integration of enablers from phase 2 > projects. However, you are still free to contact enablers development teams > directly and propose your contribution. > > - Can anyone use FIWARE and FI-STAR? > - Can we start our own FIWARE project without the use of a > acceleration program? > > -> FIWARE is open to everybody so any use, outside of the acceleration > program is much welcome. > > - Can we start a traineeship around FIWARE? > > -> http://edu.fiware.org aims at providing a starting point. To go > further, developers weeks are organized regularly. Next one will be in > Vienna on May 26-28: > http://www.fiware.org/event/fiware-developers-week-vienna/ > > - FI-LAB: How long do we have access to our node/instance? > - Do we have to pay after the FICHe program is over? > > -> FIWARE overall intends to be sustainable. FIWARE lab will at least > remains accessible in the current conditions until the end of the > on-going-projects (~end 2016). Conditions for follow-up are under > discussion. > > - Do we need to use the FI-LAB during the PoC phase? > > -> It is intended to accelerate your development but there are no > obligations. > > - Questions regarding enablers > - A lot of enablers are still in alpha/beta phases. What is the > roadmap for these enablers? When do you expect to have a stable release for > these enablers? > > -> Enablers roadmap is available here : > http://forge.fiware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Technical_Roadmap > > - It seems that some enablers have been removed from the catalogue. Why > did this happen and will they return? > > -> Some enablers were removed at the end of last year when the release of > at least one implementation as open-source as be put as mandatory. Some > enablers contributors stepped back at that time. > > - What are the risks when a enabler receives an update? Could it be > possible that our implementation needs an update as well? > > -> Yes, this is a high risk. I have not seen yet systematic non-regression > testing on enablers. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-fiche-coaching mailing list > Fiware-fiche-coaching@lists.fi-ware.org > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-fiche-coaching > > – Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-06-8759-4253 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 twitter: @depa01 _______________________________________________ Fiware-fiche-coaching mailing list Fiware-fiche-coaching@lists.fi-ware.org https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-fiche-coaching

          People

          • Assignee:
            flegall Franck Le Gall
            Reporter:
            flegall Franck Le Gall
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: