Uploaded image for project: 'Help-Coaches-Desk'
  1. Help-Coaches-Desk
  2. HELC-1290

FIWARE.Request.Coach.FI-C3.Re: Questions POI Data Provider

    Details

    • Type: extRequest
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Done
    • Component/s: FI-C3
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Dear Franck,

      As indicated before by Frank Verbeeck, we started our analysis of the
      FIWARE enablers in the context of our FIC3 project ‘QuAALity’ in
      collaboration with Gociety, in order to be able to integrate them in the
      Gociety architecture in a next step.

      We started with the POI Data Provider GE, on which we have the following
      questions:

      • The enabler uses two separate databases; a (structured) PostGIS
        database on the Generic POI server to do spatial search of location points,
        and a (unstructured) database (e.g., MongoDB) on the business-specific POI
        server to store extra business-specific POI info. As the choice for two
        databases means that you need to support two technologies, we were
        wondering about the rationale for this choice? MongoDB namely also provides
        geospatial query operators (using GeoJSON), and is thus similar in
        functionality as PostGIS (
        https://docs.mongodb.org/v3.0/reference/operator/query-geospatial/).
        Does PostGIS provide distinguishing features which could be interesting to
        explore in our context, e.g. the actual detection of POIs, faster lookups,
        ...?
      • The documentation of the POI Data Provider suggests to install the
        Pecl_HTTP module voor PHP 5. However, the most recent version of this
        module only runs with PHP7. We thus see two options: either upgrading to
        PHP7 (our preferred option), or install a lower version of the module
        (e.g., 2.1.1). Does a choice for one of these options impact the
        functionality of the enabler?
      • The file 'example_poi_2_fw_relationships.json’ in the
        'install_scripts/test_data/‘ folder is missing on the Git repository of the
        enabler, which results in an error. In the commit history, we found an
        earlier version of that file, with which we can successfully install the
        module, although we were wondering if any more recent updates/fixes to this
        file were made that were not recorded in the Git repository?

      Thanks in advance for your feedback.

      Best regards,

      Mathias

      1. 60AFA5DE-0685-425D-A28C-F94E97C121D2[293].jpg
        24 kB
      2. A12175CC-BD1D-47C7-AEF6-6FD0E8B44966[293].jpg
        6 kB
      3. image001.png
        2 kB
      4. image001.png
        2 kB
      5. image001.png
        2 kB
      6. image002.jpg
        0.3 kB
      7. image002.jpg
        0.3 kB
      8. image002.jpg
        0.3 kB

        Issue Links

          Activity

          backlogmanager Backlog Manager made changes -
          Summary Re: [Fiware-fic3-coaching] Questions POI Data Provider FIWARE.Request.Coach.FI-C3.Re: Questions POI Data Provider
          flegall Franck Le Gall made changes -
          Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
          Status Answered [ 10104 ] Closed [ 6 ]
          flegall Franck Le Gall made changes -
          Status In Progress [ 3 ] Answered [ 10104 ]
          flegall Franck Le Gall made changes -
          Attachment image001.png [ 19878 ]
          Attachment image002.jpg [ 19879 ]
          backlogmanager Backlog Manager made changes -
          Component/s _TECH_ [ 11400 ]
          backlogmanager Backlog Manager made changes -
          Link This issue relates to HELP-6014 [ HELP-6014 ]
          flegall Franck Le Gall made changes -
          Status Open [ 1 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
          flegall Franck Le Gall made changes -
          Component/s _TECH_ [ 11400 ]
          flegall Franck Le Gall made changes -
          Description Matthias,



          I added the fiware-fic3-coaching@lists.fiware.org addres also, this creates
          a ticket in the system that Franck and his colleagues use for support
          tracking. .



          Other sources to check are also https://ask.fiware.org/questions/ and the the
          e-learning portal. <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=96>









          Johnny



          *From:* Mathias Verbeke [mailto:Mathias.Verbeke@sirris.be]
          *Sent:* maandag 29 februari 2016 15:47
          *To:* Franck Le Gall
          *Cc:* Frank Verbeek; Johnny Waterschoot; Tom Tourwé
          *Subject:* Re: Questions POI Data Provider



          Dear Franck,



          This is a kind reminder on my mail below, with some questions regarding the
          POI Data Provider.



          Thanks in advance,



          Mathias







          *Mathias* *Verbeke*, , PhD
          Data Innovation Scientist
          +32 494 03 27 47

          Bd. A. Reyerslaan 80
          B-1030 Brussels

          www.sirris.be - blog.sirris.be - techniline.sirris.be

          The Collective Center for the Belgian technology industry
          Antwerpen - Brussels - Charleroi - Gent - Hasselt - Kortrijk - Leuven -
          Liège

          [image: Image removed by sender. LinkedIn]
          <https://www.linkedin.com/company/sirris>

          [image: Image removed by sender. Follow us on Twitter]
          <https://twitter.com/Sirris_be>





          *From: *Mathias Verbeke <mathias.verbeke@sirris.be>
          *Date: *Thursday 18 February 2016 16:29
          *To: *Franck Le Gall <franck.le-gall@eglobalmark.com>
          *Cc: *Frank Verbeek <frank@gociety.eu>, Johnny Waterschoot <
          johnny.waterschoot@iminds.be>, Tom Tourwé <tom.tourwe@sirris.be>
          *Subject: *Questions POI Data Provider



          Dear Franck,



          As indicated before by Frank Verbeeck, we started our analysis of the
          FIWARE enablers in the context of our FIC3 project ‘QuAALity’ in
          collaboration with Gociety, in order to be able to integrate them in the
          Gociety architecture in a next step.



          We started with the POI Data Provider GE, on which we have the following
          questions:

             - The enabler uses two separate databases; a (structured) PostGIS
             database on the Generic POI server to do spatial search of location points,
             and a (unstructured) database (e.g., MongoDB) on the business-specific POI
             server to store extra business-specific POI info. As the choice for two
             databases means that you need to support two technologies, we were
             wondering about the rationale for this choice? MongoDB namely also provides
             geospatial query operators (using GeoJSON), and is thus similar in
             functionality as PostGIS (
             https://docs.mongodb.org/v3.0/reference/operator/query-geospatial/).
             Does PostGIS provide distinguishing features which could be interesting to
             explore in our context, e.g. the actual detection of POIs, faster lookups,
             ...?
             - The documentation of the POI Data Provider suggests to install the
             Pecl_HTTP module voor PHP 5. However, the most recent version of this
             module only runs with PHP7. We thus see two options: either upgrading to
             PHP7 (our preferred option), or install a lower version of the module
             (e.g., 2.1.1). Does a choice for one of these options impact the
             functionality of the enabler?
             - The file 'example_poi_2_fw_relationships.json’ in the
             'install_scripts/test_data/‘ folder is missing on the Git repository of the
             enabler, which results in an error. In the commit history, we found an
             earlier version of that file, with which we can successfully install the
             module, although we were wondering if any more recent updates/fixes to this
             file were made that were not recorded in the Git repository?

          Thanks in advance for your feedback.



          Best regards,



          Mathias

          Since January 1st, old domains won't be supported and messages sent to any domain different to @lists.fiware.org will be lost.
          Please, send your messages using the new domain (Fiware-fic3-coaching@lists.fiware.org) instead of the old one.
          _______________________________________________
          Fiware-fic3-coaching mailing list
          Fiware-fic3-coaching@lists.fiware.org
          https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-fic3-coaching
          [Created via e-mail received from: Johnny Waterschoot <johnny.waterschoot@iminds.be>]



          Dear Franck,



          As indicated before by Frank Verbeeck, we started our analysis of the
          FIWARE enablers in the context of our FIC3 project ‘QuAALity’ in
          collaboration with Gociety, in order to be able to integrate them in the
          Gociety architecture in a next step.



          We started with the POI Data Provider GE, on which we have the following
          questions:

             - The enabler uses two separate databases; a (structured) PostGIS
             database on the Generic POI server to do spatial search of location points,
             and a (unstructured) database (e.g., MongoDB) on the business-specific POI
             server to store extra business-specific POI info. As the choice for two
             databases means that you need to support two technologies, we were
             wondering about the rationale for this choice? MongoDB namely also provides
             geospatial query operators (using GeoJSON), and is thus similar in
             functionality as PostGIS (
             https://docs.mongodb.org/v3.0/reference/operator/query-geospatial/).
             Does PostGIS provide distinguishing features which could be interesting to
             explore in our context, e.g. the actual detection of POIs, faster lookups,
             ...?
             - The documentation of the POI Data Provider suggests to install the
             Pecl_HTTP module voor PHP 5. However, the most recent version of this
             module only runs with PHP7. We thus see two options: either upgrading to
             PHP7 (our preferred option), or install a lower version of the module
             (e.g., 2.1.1). Does a choice for one of these options impact the
             functionality of the enabler?
             - The file 'example_poi_2_fw_relationships.json’ in the
             'install_scripts/test_data/‘ folder is missing on the Git repository of the
             enabler, which results in an error. In the commit history, we found an
             earlier version of that file, with which we can successfully install the
             module, although we were wondering if any more recent updates/fixes to this
             file were made that were not recorded in the Git repository?

          Thanks in advance for your feedback.



          Best regards,



          Mathias
          fw.ext.user FW External User made changes -
          Attachment image002.jpg [ 19875 ]
          Attachment A12175CC-BD1D-47C7-AEF6-6FD0E8B44966[293].jpg [ 19876 ]
          Attachment 60AFA5DE-0685-425D-A28C-F94E97C121D2[293].jpg [ 19877 ]
          Attachment image001.png [ 19874 ]
          backlogmanager Backlog Manager made changes -
          Assignee Franck Le Gall [ franck.le-gall ]
          backlogmanager Backlog Manager made changes -
          Field Original Value New Value
          Component/s FI-C3 [ 10360 ]
          fw.ext.user FW External User created issue -

            People

            • Assignee:
              flegall Franck Le Gall
              Reporter:
              fw.ext.user FW External User
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: