Details
-
Type:
extRequest
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Done
-
Fix Version/s: 2021
-
Component/s: FIWARE-TECH-HELP
-
Labels:None
-
HD-Chapter:Catalogue
Description
Dear all,
as part of our QA project, we measure also quality of Catalogue pages to help FIWARE QA team to validate compliance of published content with the Guide.
Guide:
https://forge.fiware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Working_with_the_FIWARE_catalogue#Guidelines_on_what_to_write
Now we have established a first set of metrics and automated the measurement procedure.
Whom to talk regarding validating the metrics themselves, especially their weighting as well as mapping to Labels?
Metrics and weights established following the Guide (first edition!):
https://github.com/sigspl/org.fiware.qa.documentation.measurements/blob/master/qa_docs_metrics.csv
Measurement results:
https://github.com/sigspl/org.fiware.qa.documentation.measurements/blob/master/enablers_data.csv
Currently, best-rated Enablers get score of 34% which we consider to be D.
Activity
| Field | Original Value | New Value |
|---|---|---|
| Component/s | FIWARE-FEEDBACK [ 10281 ] |
| Assignee | Federico Michele Facca [ ffacca ] |
| Component/s | FIWARE-TECH-HELP [ 10278 ] | |
| Component/s | FIWARE-FEEDBACK [ 10281 ] |
| HD-Chapter | Catalogue [ 10844 ] |
| Assignee | Federico Michele Facca [ ffacca ] |
| Assignee | Davide Dalle Carbonare [ davidedallecarbonare ] |
| Status | Open [ 1 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
| Assignee | Davide Dalle Carbonare [ davidedallecarbonare ] | Clara Pezuela [ cpezuela ] |
| Assignee | Clara Pezuela [ cpezuela ] | Stefano De Panfilis [ stefano ] |
| Resolution | Done [ 10000 ] | |
| Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | Closed [ 6 ] |
| Summary | Quality of Enabler documentation in the Catalogue / Guide compliance | FIWARE.Request.Tech.Catalogue.Quality of Enabler documentation in the Catalogue / Guide compliance |
| Fix Version/s | 2021 [ 12600 ] |