Details
-
Type: Monitor
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority: Major
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: 2021
-
Component/s: FIWARE-TECH-HELP
-
Labels:
-
HD-Chapter:Data
-
HD-Enabler:Orion
Description
Created in FIWARE Q/A platform on 26-10-2014 at 09:10
Answer this issue at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26571357/fiware-enablers-and-compability-with-each-other
Question:
FIWARE enablers and compability with each other
Description:
I'm studying this FIWARE platform and not sure whole the enabler usage should be implemented and how can enablers used with together?
So let's say I have a mobile client and I want to use Orion for user database. Do I make my own server as wrapper which would be calling the Orion instance?
Then lets say that User can have an image, so I guess that would be Object Storage GE. How to link Orion with Object Storage?
Then I want to add some security which I assume to be for example Keyrock GE. How to enable that with Orion or does the Keyrock itself have a underlying database implementation. If yes, is Orion completely useless when using Keyrock.
How to know if some enabler already contains implementation of another?
Thanks.
Activity
Transition | Time In Source Status | Execution Times | Last Executer | Last Execution Date | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
16m 32s | 1 | Fermín Galán | 18/Sep/15 3:41 PM | |||||
|
4s | 1 | Fermín Galán | 18/Sep/15 3:41 PM | |||||
|
2s | 1 | Fermín Galán | 18/Sep/15 3:41 PM |
Fix Version/s | 2021 [ 12600 ] |
HD-Enabler | Orion [ 10875 ] | |
HD-Chapter | Data [ 10838 ] |
Summary | FIWARE.Question.Lab.FIWARE enablers and compability with each other | FIWARE.Question.Tech.Data.OrionContextBroker.FIWAREEnablersAndCompabilityWithEachOther |
Resolution | Done [ 10000 ] | |
Status | Answered [ 10104 ] | Closed [ 6 ] |
Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | Answered [ 10104 ] |
Status | Open [ 1 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
Assignee | Fermín Galán [ fermin ] |
Field | Original Value | New Value |
---|---|---|
Component/s | FIWARE-TECH-HELP [ 10278 ] |
User has been requested to split the question into 4 separated questions (see SOF comments). Thus, I consider this issue solved.