Uploaded image for project: 'Help-Desk'
  1. Help-Desk
  2. HELP-3353

FIWARE.Request.Lab.Zurich.Possibility of using additional capacity to mirror FIC2Lab&FIWARE integration server

    Details

    • Type: extRequest
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Done
    • Fix Version/s: 2021
    • Component/s: FIWARE-LAB-HELP
    • Labels:
      None
    • HD-Node:
      Zurich

      Description

      Dear FIWARE support team,

      in terms of FIC2Lab project we have set up a big machine which autonomously performs integration and functional testing using a container-based unit test runner (one unit test per SE or GE is one Jenkins job creating, testing and destroying a Docker container).

      This machine is currently hosted by Lannion2.

      As the number of software components we support this way in terms of sustainability grows, and we expect e.g. more GEs to come, I think it makes sense to request additional capacity from another node located somewhere else aside from Lannion to reduce risks of service outage.

      Beyond the project scope we plan also to scale up the complexity of testing e.g. add load testing or other.

      How do you think what is the best way to pick a node who would agree to provide a somewhat bigger flavour as we use it at Lannion?

      • 4-6 CPUs
      • 16 or better 24 GB RAM because of required environment simulation of more complex components. We have got one which alone requires at least 16GB and this in my opinion might cause heavy disk swapping and overall system performance decrease.
      • 80 GB disk size
      • 500 GB additional volume as Docker images cache

      Attached: current Jenkins status dashboard.

        Activity

        peter Peter Muryshkin created issue -
        peter Peter Muryshkin made changes -
        Field Original Value New Value
        Description Dear FIWARE support team,

        in terms of FIC2Lab project we have set up a big machine which autonomously performs integration and functional testing using a container-based unit test runner (one unit test per SE or GE is one Jenkins job creating, testing and destroying a Docker container).

        This machine is currently hosted by Lannion2.

        As the number of software components we support this way in terms of sustainability grows, and we expect e.g. more GEs to come, I think it makes sense to request additional capacity from another node located somewhere else aside from Lannion to reduce risks of service outage.

        Beyond the project scope we plan also to scale up the complexity of testing e.g. add load testing or other.

        Who do you think what is the best way to pick a node who would agree to provide a somewhat bigger flavour as we use it at Lannion?

        - 4-6 CPUs
        - 16 or better 24 GB RAM because of required environment simulation of more complex components. We have got one which alone requires at least 16GB and this in my opinion might cause heavy disk swapping and overall system performance decrease.
        - 80 GB disk size
        - 500 GB additional volume as Docker images cache

        Attached: current Jenkins status dashboard.

        Dear FIWARE support team,

        in terms of FIC2Lab project we have set up a big machine which autonomously performs integration and functional testing using a container-based unit test runner (one unit test per SE or GE is one Jenkins job creating, testing and destroying a Docker container).

        This machine is currently hosted by Lannion2.

        As the number of software components we support this way in terms of sustainability grows, and we expect e.g. more GEs to come, I think it makes sense to request additional capacity from another node located somewhere else aside from Lannion to reduce risks of service outage.

        Beyond the project scope we plan also to scale up the complexity of testing e.g. add load testing or other.

        How do you think what is the best way to pick a node who would agree to provide a somewhat bigger flavour as we use it at Lannion?

        - 4-6 CPUs
        - 16 or better 24 GB RAM because of required environment simulation of more complex components. We have got one which alone requires at least 16GB and this in my opinion might cause heavy disk swapping and overall system performance decrease.
        - 80 GB disk size
        - 500 GB additional volume as Docker images cache

        Attached: current Jenkins status dashboard.

        mev Manuel Escriche made changes -
        Component/s FIWARE-LAB-HELP [ 10279 ]
        mev Manuel Escriche made changes -
        Assignee Pietropaolo Alfonso [ alfopietro ]
        mev Manuel Escriche made changes -
        Issue Type eRequest [ 10101 ] extRequest [ 10104 ]
        Workflow FW eRequest Workflow [ 31309 ] FW extRequest Workflow-II [ 31309 ]
        danielepavia Daniele Pavia (Inactive) made changes -
        Status Open [ 1 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
        danielepavia Daniele Pavia (Inactive) made changes -
        Assignee Pietropaolo Alfonso [ alfopietro ] Lannion Node Helpdesk [ lannionsupportteam ]
        danielepavia Daniele Pavia (Inactive) made changes -
        Assignee Lannion Node Helpdesk [ lannionsupportteam ] Daniele Pavia [ danielepavia ]
        danielepavia Daniele Pavia (Inactive) made changes -
        Assignee Daniele Pavia [ danielepavia ] Zurich Node Helpdesk [ zhaw node helpdesk ]
        peter Peter Muryshkin made changes -
        Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
        Status In Progress [ 3 ] Closed [ 6 ]
        mev Manuel Escriche made changes -
        HD-Node Zurich [ 10926 ]
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager made changes -
        Summary Possibility of using additional capacity to mirror FIC2Lab&FIWARE integration server FIWARE.Request.Lab.Zurich.Possibility of using additional capacity to mirror FIC2Lab&FIWARE integration server
        peter Peter Muryshkin made changes -
        Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
        Status Closed [ 6 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
        ZHAW Node Helpdesk Zurich Node Helpdesk made changes -
        Status In Progress [ 3 ] Answered [ 10104 ]
        ZHAW Node Helpdesk Zurich Node Helpdesk made changes -
        Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
        Status Answered [ 10104 ] Closed [ 6 ]
        fla Fernando Lopez made changes -
        Fix Version/s 2021 [ 12600 ]

          People

          • Assignee:
            ZHAW Node Helpdesk Zurich Node Helpdesk
            Reporter:
            peter Peter Muryshkin
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            5 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: