Uploaded image for project: 'Help-Desk'
  1. Help-Desk
  2. HELP-15768

[fiware-stackoverflow] FIWARE: Scaling IoT Agents

    Details

    • Type: Monitor
    • Status: Answered
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: FIWARE-TECH-HELP
    • Labels:

      Description

      Created question in FIWARE Q/A platform on 02-05-2019 at 12:05
      Please, ANSWER this question AT https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55950230/fiware-scaling-iot-agents

      Question:
      FIWARE: Scaling IoT Agents

      Description:
      If one had a large FIWARE IoT system with a smart city's worth of connected devices, how would the IoT Agents be scaled?

      Would the IoT Agents share state with each other like the Context Brokers or is the recommended strategy to divide devices among the IoT Agents?

      If it's the former, are there any recommendations on the number of devices per agent? If it's the latter, are there some settings for sharing state?

        Activity

        backlogmanager Backlog Manager created issue -
        Hide
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager added a comment -

        2019-05-02 15:06|CREATED monitor | # answers= 0, accepted answer= False

        Show
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager added a comment - 2019-05-02 15:06|CREATED monitor | # answers= 0, accepted answer= False
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager made changes -
        Field Original Value New Value
        Component/s FIWARE-TECH-HELP [ 10278 ]
        fla Fernando Lopez made changes -
        Assignee Fermín Galán [ fermin ]
        fla Fernando Lopez made changes -
        HD-Enabler IDAS [ 10884 ]
        Description
        Created question in FIWARE Q/A platform on 02-05-2019 at 12:05
        {color: red}Please, ANSWER this question AT{color} https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55950230/fiware-scaling-iot-agents


        +Question:+
        FIWARE: Scaling IoT Agents

        +Description:+
        If one had a large FIWARE IoT system with a smart city's worth of connected devices, how would the IoT Agents be scaled?

        Would the IoT Agents share state with each other like the Context Brokers or is the recommended strategy to divide devices among the IoT Agents?

        If it's the former, are there any recommendations on the number of devices per agent? If it's the latter, are there some settings for sharing state?
        Created question in FIWARE Q/A platform on 02-05-2019 at 12:05
        {color: red}Please, ANSWER this question AT{color} https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55950230/fiware-scaling-iot-agents


        +Question:+
        FIWARE: Scaling IoT Agents

        +Description:+
        If one had a large FIWARE IoT system with a smart city's worth of connected devices, how would the IoT Agents be scaled?

        Would the IoT Agents share state with each other like the Context Brokers or is the recommended strategy to divide devices among the IoT Agents?

        If it's the former, are there any recommendations on the number of devices per agent? If it's the latter, are there some settings for sharing state?
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager made changes -
        Status Open [ 1 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
        Hide
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager added a comment -

        2019-05-10 12:06|UPDATED status: transition Answer| # answers= 1, accepted answer= False

        Show
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager added a comment - 2019-05-10 12:06|UPDATED status: transition Answer| # answers= 1, accepted answer= False
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager made changes -
        Status In Progress [ 3 ] Answered [ 10104 ]
        Hide
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager added a comment -

        2019-05-10 15:06|UPDATED status: transition Answered| # answers= 1, accepted answer= False

        Show
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager added a comment - 2019-05-10 15:06|UPDATED status: transition Answered| # answers= 1, accepted answer= False
        Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times Last Executer Last Execution Date
        Open Open In Progress In Progress
        7d 20h 59m 1 Backlog Manager 10/May/19 12:06 PM
        In Progress In Progress Answered Answered
        3h 1 Backlog Manager 10/May/19 3:06 PM

          People

          • Assignee:
            fermin Fermín Galán
            Reporter:
            backlogmanager Backlog Manager
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated: