Details

    • Type: Monitor
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 2021
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Created question in FIWARE Q/A platform on 08-04-2019 at 11:04
      Please, ANSWER this question AT https://ask.fiware.org/question/1063/meteobridge/

      Question:
      meteobridge

      Description:
      Hi!

      we have several stations logging and posting through a Meteobridge dataloger. We are really interested in fiware technology in order to standardize the way to deal with all of them in upcoming projects.
      As we read and understood in your docs we should just code a iot agent, using iot agent framework (https://iotagent-node-lib.readthedocs...), which will be able to communicate with a NGSI Context Brokers.
      Do you thing its the right way to manage the comunication between a Meteobridge and NGSI Contextbroker, or we should code a middleware to talk with an already existing iot-agent (JSON - MQTT)?

      Cheers!

        Activity

        Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times Last Executer Last Execution Date
        Open Open In Progress In Progress
        59m 56s 1 Backlog Manager 09/Apr/19 10:05 AM
        In Progress In Progress Answered Answered
        1h 1 Backlog Manager 09/Apr/19 11:05 AM
        Answered Answered Closed Closed
        204d 22h 44m 1 Fernando Lopez 31/Oct/19 8:50 AM
        fla Fernando Lopez made changes -
        Fix Version/s 2021 [ 12600 ]
        fla Fernando Lopez made changes -
        Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
        Status Answered [ 10104 ] Closed [ 6 ]
        fla Fernando Lopez made changes -
        HD-Enabler IDAS [ 10884 ]
        Description
        Created question in FIWARE Q/A platform on 08-04-2019 at 11:04
        {color: red}Please, ANSWER this question AT{color} https://ask.fiware.org/question/1063/meteobridge/


        +Question:+
        meteobridge

        +Description:+
        Hi!

        we have several stations logging and posting through a Meteobridge dataloger. We are really interested in fiware technology in order to standardize the way to deal with all of them in upcoming projects.
        As we read and understood in your docs we should just code a iot agent, using iot agent framework (https://iotagent-node-lib.readthedocs...), which will be able to communicate with a NGSI Context Brokers.
        Do you thing its the right way to manage the comunication between a Meteobridge and NGSI Contextbroker, or we should code a middleware to talk with an already existing iot-agent (JSON - MQTT)?

        Cheers!
        Created question in FIWARE Q/A platform on 08-04-2019 at 11:04
        {color: red}Please, ANSWER this question AT{color} https://ask.fiware.org/question/1063/meteobridge/


        +Question:+
        meteobridge

        +Description:+
        Hi!

        we have several stations logging and posting through a Meteobridge dataloger. We are really interested in fiware technology in order to standardize the way to deal with all of them in upcoming projects.
        As we read and understood in your docs we should just code a iot agent, using iot agent framework (https://iotagent-node-lib.readthedocs...), which will be able to communicate with a NGSI Context Brokers.
        Do you thing its the right way to manage the comunication between a Meteobridge and NGSI Contextbroker, or we should code a middleware to talk with an already existing iot-agent (JSON - MQTT)?

        Cheers!
        fla Fernando Lopez made changes -
        Assignee Jose Manuel Cantera [ jmcantera ]
        Hide
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager added a comment -

        2019-04-09 11:05|UPDATED status: transition Answered| # answers= 1, accepted answer= False

        Show
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager added a comment - 2019-04-09 11:05|UPDATED status: transition Answered| # answers= 1, accepted answer= False
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager made changes -
        Status In Progress [ 3 ] Answered [ 10104 ]
        Hide
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager added a comment -

        2019-04-09 10:05|UPDATED status: transition Answer| # answers= 1, accepted answer= False

        Show
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager added a comment - 2019-04-09 10:05|UPDATED status: transition Answer| # answers= 1, accepted answer= False
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager made changes -
        Field Original Value New Value
        Status Open [ 1 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
        Hide
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager added a comment -

        2019-04-09 09:05|CREATED monitor | # answers= 0, accepted answer= False

        Show
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager added a comment - 2019-04-09 09:05|CREATED monitor | # answers= 0, accepted answer= False
        backlogmanager Backlog Manager created issue -

          People

          • Assignee:
            jmcantera Jose Manuel Cantera
            Reporter:
            backlogmanager Backlog Manager
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: