Uploaded image for project: 'Help-Coaches-Desk'
  1. Help-Coaches-Desk
  2. HELC-1185

FIWARE.Request.Coach.SOUL-FI.Fwd: myCultureTrip & Location Platform GE integration

    Details

    • Type: extRequest
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Done
    • Component/s: SOUL-FI
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Hi Sérgio,

      ​Can you help me answer to myCulture Trip.

      ​Are there more GE's with similar problem?

      Many thanks,​


      ---------- Mensagem encaminhada ----------
      De: "Stavros Tekes" <stavros@dotsoft.gr>
      Data: 11/12/2015 6:15 da tarde
      Assunto: myCultureTrip & Location Platform GE integration
      Para: "Nuno Varandas (ipn.pt)" <nvarandas@ipn.pt>, "Maria Augusta Mancini" <
      mancini.marag@gmail.com>
      Cc: "Dimitra Perperidou" <dperperidou@dotsoft.gr>

      Dear Mr Varandas,

      In the myCultureTrip project that we are currently developing we were
      planning to use the Location Platform GE.

      However we realised that the enabler is not listed under the generic
      enablers in the FIWARE catalogue anymore so we tried to track the
      developer. We were directed to Thales Alenia Space (Mr. Challamel Remi) and
      they told us that the enabler is not any more supported internally in TAS-F
      and the product and its IPR had been tranfered to their sister company
      'Telespazio'. We were forwarded a Telespazio contact and after some email
      exchanges and conference calls, we realised that they are going to
      comercialize the product and also use it to participate in H2020 projects.

      This means that this is not an FIWARE enabler anymore and in order for us
      to use it in the future, we might be requested to purchase a license.

      We have researched in the FIWARE catalogue but there is no other similar
      enabler that can cover the functionality we indented to do with Location
      Platform GE. We have already brought the issue to our coach (Mrs
      Maria Augusta Mancini) and she thought it shouldn't be a problem not to
      integrate with one enabler since we have already integrated with the other
      six enablers we planned.

      Do you think it will be a problem for DOTSOFT or for SOULFI, if we use one
      enabler less than the ones we originally planned to? For the record we have
      already tracked other ways to verify a users location using third party
      tools so that won't be a problem for our project.

      Looking forward to your answer at your earlier convenience,

      Have a great weekend,

      Regards,

      Stavros

      Since January 1st, old domains won't be supported and messages sent to any domain different to @lists.fiware.org will be lost.
      Please, send your messages using the new domain (Fiware-soulfi-coaching@lists.fiware.org) instead of the old one.
      _______________________________________________
      Fiware-soulfi-coaching mailing list
      Fiware-soulfi-coaching@lists.fiware.org
      https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-soulfi-coaching
      [Created via e-mail received from: "Nuno Varandas (ipn.pt)" <nvarandas@ipn.pt>]

        Activity

        Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times Last Executer Last Execution Date
        Open Open In Progress In Progress
        21h 47m 1 Sergio Garcia Gomez 14/Dec/15 2:56 PM
        In Progress In Progress Closed Closed
        2s 1 Sergio Garcia Gomez 14/Dec/15 2:56 PM

          People

          • Assignee:
            sergg Sergio Garcia Gomez
            Reporter:
            fw.ext.user FW External User
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: